Thanks for the comment Tim,

I will insert the word “published” and note that it is routinely not included in the literature. And the commented wasn’t arguing with that point.

He said, “97% has been thoroughly debunked, and anyone using it is deliberately quoting a lie.” and he used pseudoscience references to say that the 97% number was fasle.

I would also note that the commenter is following one, has no followers, has not posted anything, and shows no other activity.

Thanks again.