Henry, I will respond here and will also reply to your post, which included a link on my blog post. I do not allow people to post links on my stories and they will likely be muted or hidden. You have a couple of points that are fact-based, such as the permafrost, but then you use the alarming permafrost to support your argument that science doesn't know enough to predict anthropogenic climate change and that they are doing it for the money. And there are other fallacies in your reasoning as well. If you are going to comment please have the courtesy to acquaint yourself with the fact-based science at skepticalscience.com.